Primary Education is Lacking!

We spend a lot of time persuading others. Whether it is what kind of take-out food we want, what to watch at the cinema, or just exactly what to think of Donald Trump. One thing is certain, a lot more time than we think is spent trying to persuade. For most, persuasion is part of their daily routine. For some, their job is built entirely around it. We often see politicians persuading people that their party is the best, celebrities persuading the public to give to charity, lawyers persuading an audience of someone’s innocence or guilt.

So, it’s safe to say that the ability to persuade is pretty important, which is why my focus has been on classical rhetoric of late. If you’ve been following my blog recently, you may have noticed that I have been writing a lot about classical rhetoric and how it can improve writing. I have talked about structure and techniques, but – apart from some small quotes from literature – have provided very little in the way of an example of how it could be used. With this in mind, I have decided to give an example of a polemic I wrote a month or so before Christmas as a piece of coursework for my Master’s degree.

So what exactly is a polemic? It is, in the briefest terms, a strong verbal or written attack on someone or something. Politicians are often seen delivering these. The idea of a polemic is to persuade the audience, often by creating an emotional response or call to action.

The polemic below uses several of the schemes of repetition I’ve talked about previously, such as anadiplosis, diacope, and antimetabole. It also follows the basic structure of a piece of classical rhetoric, which I mentioned here. The layout is as follows: exordium (introduction), narratio (background facts),  confimatio (main body of text), refutatio (dealing with other points of view), and peroratio (conclusion).

This piece was written for public presentation.

Primary Education is Lacking

Primary education is lacking! Lacking in creativity, creativity which is crucial for an individual’s professional development, development that could shape that individual’s future career and life. Creativity – a word often mistakenly attributed to the arts – can take many forms. For example, a person can be creative in maths, science, cuisine, dance, teaching, learning, writing, exercising, or engineering, the list goes on. We live in a world of constant innovation, a world where creativity in the workplace is often valued above a regular academic degree. Why then, do primary schools insist primarily on crushing that creativity and self-expression with exam coaching and standardised testing?

            Primary Education is lacking! For the last two years, the government has been driving children towards a future in STEM subjects, with little regard for what that child is actually good at. Three of the five primary schools in my local area have an ‘art day’. An ‘art day’, can you believe that? One day a year where the children can express themselves artistically. Even outside of primary education creative curricula suffer, Art History is gone, Drama is going, Creative Writing is going to go. Even here, in this university where I studied Creative Writing, you can no longer study a Creative Writing degree because it has been assimilated into professional writing. But I digress, this year in primary schools we have seen the implementation of new, ‘more rigorous’ tests for which eleven-year-olds must be drilled even harder to achieve a passable grade. It’s as if we’re going to put a big stamp of approval on a child’s head after school that says ‘this product is fit for work.’ This focus on learning by rote, this focus on repetition, this focus on looking good as an educational establishment is stifling the creativity of the children of this country.

            Primary Education is lacking! Time and time again it has been proved that learning by rote does not suit every pupil, and that very few students find rote learning stimulating. Stimulation! Where is the stimulation that should be present in every classroom? It isn’t there. There is nothing even slightly stimulating about repeating the same exercise over and over again. A more diverse and creative curriculum is needed, where the individual child is nurtured, rather than taught as part of a thirty-strong group. These children are educated in groups, but groups unable to educate each other. These children are told that there is one answer to a question, they are told to work by themselves and to not copy each other, because – they are told – it is cheating to work together to solve a problem. Outside of primary education, this is called, ‘cooperation, ‘coordination’, or ‘collaboration’.

            Primary education is lacking. So what can we do to stop it lacking? For a start, stop separating children by age. Why is age the most important characteristic of a child? It is not their age that makes them unique, but rather what they enjoy doing. There are ten-year-olds out there who far excel me in watercolour painting, and one of those child’s peers – who sits next to them in class – may be fantastic at maths, but terrible at painting. Why is it fair to teach them as though they are complete equals? It isn’t.

            Now some may say, that it isn’t fair if we don’t treat every child the same. That only being treated equally guarantees that every child has an equal chance in life. To that, I say it’s not that simple. Yes, we should give each child equal time, but if every child were equal, then every child would learn the same way, at the same time, and achieve the same grades. Children do not ship with factory settings, their minds are as complex and as vast as the ocean. If you do not explore that ocean, and only bother to take the same pre-established routes, then how can you expect a child to develop into a diverse and skilled member of the future workforce? Others may argue that the system must work because it has been in place for so long. And that is exactly the problem, we still have the same classroom system from a hundred years ago, it is time to move on and reflect our progressive society in our education system. Primary education is lacking, and if we don’t stop this destruction of future creativity, there will be no-one creative enough left to fix it in the future. Thank you.


As always, I appreciate the time you take reading my articles. Have a good week.

Another post on classical rhetoric (focusing on balance) is coming next week.

Thanks for reading.

7 thoughts on “Primary Education is Lacking!

  1. Mandie Hines

    Standardized testing takes up valuable time that could be used to teach children other things. Poetry is being phased out of schools, and what a loss to children and the world. Workplaces want innovative thinking, but we’re snuffing out creativity in schools. It’s long frustrated me that we’re taught that creative, artistic endeavors are hobbies, not serious careers. Interesting read. So many more thoughts on this subject, but I think you brought up a multitude of flaws in the educational system that need attention and consideration, while demonstrating the structure and techniques you’ve recently discussed in your classical rhetoric posts.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you, Mandie. I always appreciate your insightful comments on my posts. I know a fair amount of teachers, teaching assistants, and even a headteacher who share our sympathies. Unfortunately, there is only so much the curriculum can be stretched to and, despite these wonderful teachers trying to be creative, there is only so much that can be done before they get into trouble for not following the strict rules. It is a shame, and something that needs attention like you say.

      Thanks again for the comment!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I’ve been enjoying these classical rhetoric lessons – they’ve been particularly helpful in ‘putting the name to the idea’, so to speak…😂 Incidentally, I’ve just realized from this article that education in Britain seems to be running eerie parallels with the education system in the country I reside in – especially on the previous overemphasis on STEM and business-oriented subjects for degrees. There is also a deeply ingrained belief that artistic endeavours don’t earn well. The situation over here is improving at least, thanks to the addition of art-inclined universities and courses. It would be a shame for Britain to lose an integral part of its culture through ‘education’ schemes like this. Perhaps some compromise between the soft and hard sciences could be achieved? Creativity is an essential ingredient of innovation and growth in both areas after all.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. It would be a shame indeed. I won’t deny that recently some steps have been made in the right direction, but artistic courses and creative thinking is shirked for coaching for tests. Often this coaching is impractical, and not helpful for aiding a child to progress further. I feel like creative and practical, soft and hard, academic and vocational skills should be taught in equal measure. Only then, will children truly have an inkling on what they may want to pursue in life.

      I’m glad you’ve been enjoying these posts! Thanks for reading.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. There have been extremely worrying shifts in education since… Margaret Thatcher first, in my lifetime… even before Lanour were ousted there seemed some ‘great industrial mogul plan’ to tuin the country. Every political party has it’s nice presentable ‘popular’ and media friendly sabotagist working to turn back the clock to ensure elitist hirrarchial divisions are stronger than ever. Back in the 90s SRB funding was targeting and envouraging developments such as ‘extended schools’ and 24hour accessibility to services. Cloth-ears and dim-wits in public services made sure to only allow lazy applicants to take funded positions in limiting job creation schemes, sabotage regeneration and set all areas to Fail! Public services via Local Authorities then seize control of assets and services that were intended to be ‘in community ownership’ while forever blaming ‘dysfunctional families and generational disadvantage’. It’s like policymakers speak with forked tongue! Much more I could comment with but housework to try next! But leavi ng Europe was fixed way back even before when they stopped funding European language teaching in secondary schools. Clumsy commenting from phone! Rant over! Cheers 🙂


  4. As a teacher of 1st through 8th Grades in a school that has opted out of the nationally set curriculum and standardized testing, I’m 99% in agreement with your arguments. One thing I have learned, though, is that repetition and memorization are natural learning tools for young kids. My daughter’s favorite book we called “the Cat Book” and she brought it to me to read to her over one hundred times. Or I read a sketch called “The Wide-Mouthed Frog” with my First Graders and they immediately asked to act it out. They did this over and over again until everyone had taken every role at least once. They all had it memorized in the end.
    Of course the difference here is that the wish to repeat came from inside themselves. I could have easily killed off that desire be simply asking them (or worse, telling) them to do it. “Now go home and memorize this sketch so that we can act it out tomorrow.” That would have bombed.

    I always say that “kids love learning until we teach them not to”.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you for the insightful comment. I totally agree with what you are saying. Repetition is one useful learning tool. However, the way repetition as a learning process is approach is generally drab, dull, and boring. There is very little creativity funnelled into repetitive learning, and what is being taught is generally uninteresting, uninspired, and geared towards passing tests that have little-to-no practical worth.

      It’s not the teachers’ fault, it’s not the child or the parents’ fault, it’s the fault of those who create these uninspired curricula. It’s nice to see that schools – such as yours – are opting out of this to find a better approach to teaching children.

      Anyway, enough of my ranting! Thanks for the comment.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s